Journal of Engineering and Manufacturing Technology
ISSN: 2053-3535
Vol. 6(3), pp. 30-37, May 2018

Comparative analysis of traffic congestion of mobile communication networks in Osogbo, Nigeria

Lasisi, Hammed1 and Aderinkola, B. Fatimah2*

1Electrical/Electronic Engineering Department, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, Osun State University, Osogbo, Nigeria.
2Electrical/Electronic Engineering Department, School of Engineering Technology, Federal Polytechnic, Ede, P. M. B. 231, Ede, Nigeria.

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:

Received 22 February, 2018; Received in revised form 27 March, 2018; Accepted 02 April, 2018.


Key performance indicators, Parameters, Threshold, Telecommunication.

Traffic congestion in mobile communication networks has been the major challenge to both the service providers and subscribers. It could be due to increased subscriber numbers along with introduction of new services by service providers. This research work comparatively analysed the traffic congestion of two leading telecommunication network providers, MTN and GLOBALCOM, around Osogbo metropolis, Osun State, Nigeria. Drive test techniques was adopted to obtain the traffic congestion audit used for benchmarking of these network providers and the various parameters involved in congestion were established. The key performance indicators (KPIs) evaluated were the call setup success rate (CSSR), call drop rate (CDR), handover success rate (HOSR), traffic channel (TCH) congestion and standalone dedicated control channel (SDCCH) congestion. The result showed that MTN had a mean value of 93.34% CSSR, 1.95% CDR, 95.28% HOSR, 2.74% TCH and 1.62% SDCCH while GLOBALCOM had mean value of 95.53% CSSR, 1.11% CDR, 92.66% HOSR, 1.40% TCH and 0.78% SDCCH, respectively. The CSSR, TCH and SDCCH of MTN and the HOSR of GLO deviates greatly from the acceptable thresholds of ≥98% CSSR, ≤2% TCH, <2% SDCCH and ≥98% HOSR recommended by the Nigerian Communication Commission. Conclusively, MTN had mean traffic congestion values slightly higher than what were experienced in GLOBALCOM.

2018 BluePen Journals Ltd.

© 2018 - BluePen Journals | Terms | Privacy policy | Advert | Help |